Maybe if we used the term "straight-immitating"...

There was always someone who knew of men who were gay but made the choice against being openly gay so as not to jeopardise their social standing and professional standing, he says.

"I was quite surprised when I socialised with people and I would talk about this storyline, and they would say: 'I know someone like that'."

[..]

"They are gay people who choose to live heterosexual lives," explains Majatladi. "From morning till nine (pm) they are straight. After nine they come out, as it were.

"These are guys who are not confused about their sexuality; they are clear about their sexual orientation, but they choose to suppress it and choose to compromise. From sun-up they are straight, and at sundown they come out."

What kind of reaction does he expect, especially from the black community?

Out of the closet ? but strictly after nine

Is it actually possible to be a "straight" "MSM"???

Then they're not really out, are they?

When I discovered this book, with its subtitle "Rejecting the Gay Identity," I was anxious to read it. Despite the fact that I am not at all ashamed of being homosexual, I do hold that sexuality is incidental. Who men like to fuck is tantamount to which dressings men like to pour on their Cobb salads.

Jack Malebranche, in Androphilia, is right here along with me—at least thus far. He takes it further, however, arguing that "masculine" homosexual men need not be saddled with the "stigma of effeminacy" simply because they fuck dudes. Rather than call themselves "gay," these men should identify as "androphiles" (men who appreciate masculinity). Androphilia was much more academic than I expected, and even includes a short essay arguing against same-sex marriage. Malebranche lives in Portland, so I took the opportunity to clear up a few misunderstandings.

These guys are going to tell me that all those "straight-acting" boys who are scared to shit to come out as gay are more of a man that a effeminate boy who proudly confesses belonging his people? They must be kidding.

Why do adolescent boys often leave empty seats between each other when they go to the movies? It's a product of the culture of male homophobia in America which pushes men to avoid intimacy and gay stereotypes.

On Saturday afternoon at the Cineplex you can see them: adolescent boys, there to watch one of the action films that Hollywood makes with an audience of young males in mind. What’s distinctive is where the boys sit in the theater. Though they might’ve come to the movie together and might even be close friends, they’ll leave an empty seat between them.

...

What accounts for that space? A short answer, something academics like me are notoriously reticent to provide, is that countless American boys and the men that they become are afraid of intimacy with each other, fearful of how intimacy might be construed -- of what others and maybe even they themselves might decide that the closeness suggests. What I’m alluding to, of course, is homophobia.

What I am suggesting is that some opposition to “gay marriage” is animated by tremendous discomfort with the love, tenderness, and intimacy between men that their marrying each other implies. Notions of men having furtive sex with multiple male partners with whom they are not in love or lastingly involved might be considerably less disagreeable.